Saturday, November 9, 2013

Is Bradley Pearson a reliable narrator?

Throughout the novel, The Black Prince, I wholeheartedly believed what Bradley told me. As the reader reading a tale in first person I felt I had to believe him. In lying to me he would be lying to himself, and what type of person would do that? I sure wouldn’t! At least not intentionally. There were several times in the novel where I found certain facts a little difficult to believe, the most important would be how Bradley had all those women just begging to get in his pants. He’s self-described and interpreted by the reader as a bitter old man. He describes himself as “thin and tall, just over six feet, fairish and not yet bald, with light fine silky rather faded straight hair. [He has] a bland diffident nervous sensitive face and thin lips and blue eyes” (Murdoch 15-16). That description does not sound very tempting to me, but apparently Rachel (a married woman), Christian (his ex-wife), and Julian (a naïve young woman) just can’t seem to get enough of him and are willing to risk anything and everything to be with him…not to mention Francis hits on him and constantly ties to convince reader and Bradley that Bradley is gay. Bradley’s manic personality change when he falls in love with Julian is also disconcerting to the reader…is he crazy or is he sane (a very Hamlet-like confliction).

(I like this photo of Hamlet—it shows his shattered self well)

However, it is in the postscripts that I completely lose faith in Bradley’s reliability. He admits that during the trial of Arnold’s Baffin’s murder that (under oath!) he changed his story over and over again: “As the time went on I tried various attitudes, said various things, changed my mind, told the truth, then lied, then broke down, was impassive, then devious, then abject…Perhaps at moments I almost believed that I had killed [Arnold], just as at moments perhaps [Rachel] almost believed that she had not” (Murdoch 374).

It also doesn’t help Bradley’s case that Christian causally discredits him at every turn and Rachel belittles his every account. Julian, possibly the one person the reader could rely on chooses instead to state she cannot accurately recall the change of events that transpired. The readers are left to decide for themselves. Personally, I want to believe Bradley, but I do not feel he’s told me the whole truth…


No comments:

Post a Comment